Loading ...Insurance Agent: Well, I spoke to the biological Mother today.
V: *laughs* Oh yeah? How did that go?
Insurance Agent: She yelled at me. She said I had no […]
Original post: Poor, Poor Insurance Agent
Insurance Agent: Well, I spoke to the biological Mother today.
V: *laughs* Oh yeah? How did that go?
Insurance Agent: She yelled at me. She said I had no […]
Original post: Poor, Poor Insurance Agent
Oh the ex’s V, what can I say that hasn’t been said. The Cruela in my nightmare gets enough money to cover child support and alimony although there was never a marriage license.
Be honest V, don’t you silently wish during your daydreaming moments that your Cruela suffered some sudden heart attack or some car accident and the world would be a better place? I know you do naughty girl - but its just as likely as people planning their retirement by buying lottery tickets!
While I don’t normally post (I don’t post ever, really) I think this just goes to show that the court’s theory about the mother’s being on the “right” side is crap. This isn’t to say that I don’t believe that fathers, married or not, shouldn’t be financially responsible in some way and all of that. However, I do feel as though the mothers receiving the money should be held responsible for what they do with it.
I suppose this isn’t exactly what V was talking about in this post, but really it’s close. Fathers are stripped of their rights as parents while at the same time being told to give their “baby’s mommas” money - it just seems completely unfair that the mothers aren’t held responsible for where the money goes, as well as the well being of the child.
I don’t know, I guess I’ve just known too many knocked up chicks to think that the money they receive is always being spent responsibly. And seeing as though the father has no choice in where the money goes…kind of unfair. I mean, if fathers were charged in diapers and baby food then okay…but a father paying for his kids’ moms new car seems unjust. Especially if she doesn’t even bother to raise the kids well, and he doesn’t get any say in the raising-matter - which I guess is V’s main point.
Sorry to ramble, but that is kind of the train or thought that is brought to mind when I hear about custody battles and poor single/step parenting. Of course, I’m not bashing on moms who receive child support and use it well - while at the same time doing a damn fine job of raising their kids. But seriously, when you are forcibly taking away someone’s wages, shouldn’t you be sure where that money is going?